15 May 2017late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
Past year: ▼ 100%(0.01c – 20.0c USD)
Each one in plain English, with the numbers worked through for a shareholder.
15 May 2017late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
31 Mar 2017late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its annual report would be filed late.
9 Nov 2016late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
9 Aug 2016late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
11 May 2016late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
14 Mar 2016late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its annual report would be filed late.
16 Feb 2016substantial holder notice● Neutral
Lloyd Brian Hannan reported a Eos Petro, Inc. shareholding of 2,871,250 shares (5.76% of votes) in a periodic institutional filing.
16 Feb 2016director interest notice● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. 10%+ owner Lowco (eos/petro) LLC bought 8,025,000 shares on the open market.
16 Feb 2016director interest notice● Neutral
Alan Gaines became a Eos Petro, Inc. Chief Executive Officer. and company insider (initial ownership filing).
16 Feb 2016substantial holder notice● Neutral
Jeff Ahlholm reported a Eos Petro, Inc. shareholding of 3,011,250 shares (6.04% of votes) in a periodic institutional filing.
16 Nov 2015quarterly activities report● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. reported quarterly revenue of $37 thousand for the period ended 2015-12-31.
9 Nov 2015late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
8 Sept 2015substantial holder notice● Neutral
Jeff Ahlholm disclosed a new substantial Eos Petro, Inc. shareholding (5.94% of votes).
8 Sept 2015substantial holder notice● Neutral
Brian Hannan disclosed a new substantial Eos Petro, Inc. shareholding (5.94% of votes).
17 Aug 2015quarterly activities report● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. reported quarterly revenue of $40 thousand for the period ended 2015-09-30.
10 Aug 2015late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
7 Aug 2015director interest notice● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. Chairman, CFO Nikolas Konstant sold 720,000 shares.
21 July 2015director interest notice● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. Chairman, CFO Nikolas Konstant sold 1,803,000 shares.
30 June 2015agm notice● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. shareholders approved the routine matters put to a vote at the company's annual meeting (director elections, auditor ratification, and the executive-pay advisory vote).
18 May 2015quarterly activities report▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. reported quarterly revenue of $71 thousand and a net loss of $17.9 million for the period ended 2015-06-30.
11 May 2015late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its quarterly report would be filed late.
6 May 2015agm notice● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. announced its upcoming annual shareholder meeting, covering the routine agenda (director elections, auditor ratification, executive-pay advisory vote).
30 Apr 2015agm notice● Neutral
Eos Petro, Inc. shareholders approved the routine matters put to a vote at the company's annual meeting (director elections, auditor ratification, and the executive-pay advisory vote).
16 Mar 2015late filing notice▼ Bad
Eos Petro, Inc. notified the SEC that its annual report would be filed late.
10 Mar 2015material agreement termination▼ BadMajor
On March 4, 2015 Dune gave notice that it is terminating the Sept 17, 2014 merger agreement with Eos, after the tender offer expired on Feb 27, 2015 with shares being returned. Dune's termination letter demands the Parent Termination Fee under the agreement and reimbursement of certain expenses; the filing gives no amount for the expenses and does not say whether Eos will pay or dispute it (earlier context noted a $5.5M termination fee payable by Eos, so this fee claim is the open exposure, an inference on the amount).
10 Mar 2015business combination▼ BadMajor
Eos filed the final amendment (No. 14) to its Dune tender offer, stating the offer expired on Feb 27, 2015 with no Dune shares purchased; Eos has told the exchange agent to return all tendered shares to Dune holders. This ends the $0.30-per-share offer that had been extended repeatedly since October 2014, so the Dune acquisition did not happen through the tender offer.
26 Feb 2015business combination● Neutral
Eos and Dune signed a tenth amendment on Feb 24, 2015 extending the tender offer to midnight NYC time on Feb 27, 2015. Negotiations on revised terms, possibly changing the $0.30 price, are still ongoing with no assurance of agreement, and any new price is not expected to be more than nominal. This is the 8-K counterpart of the Feb 25 tender-offer amendment and adds no new facts.
25 Feb 2015business combination● Neutral
On Feb 25, 2015 Eos extended the Dune offer from Feb 24 to Feb 27, 2015 for more time to negotiate revised terms. The depositary reported about 72,101,521 shares (98.76442%) tendered as of Feb 24, back up from 85.20848% as of Feb 20; the filing does not explain the swing. No revised terms are agreed, there is no assurance they will be, and any new price is not expected to be more than nominal.
24 Feb 2015business combination● Neutral
Eos and Dune signed a ninth amendment on Feb 20, 2015 extending the tender offer to midnight NYC time on Feb 24, 2015. Talks on revised terms, possibly changing the $0.30 price, continue with no assurance of agreement, and any new price is not expected to be more than nominal. This is the 8-K counterpart of the Feb 23 tender-offer amendment and adds no new facts.
23 Feb 2015business combination▼ Bad
On Feb 23, 2015 Eos extended the Dune offer by just four days, from Feb 20 to Feb 24, 2015, to keep negotiating revised terms. The depositary reported about 62,205,210 shares (85.20848%) tendered as of Feb 20, down from the 98.74% reported for Feb 13; the filing gives no reason for the swing. Still no agreed revised terms, no assurance of agreement, and any new price is not expected to be more than nominal.